Have you ever been stumped trying to figure what wall attenuation value to simulate in your predictive RF designs?  Have you wondered if reinforced concrete is “thicker” then a wall constructed with masonry bricks? The chart below summarizes relative attenuation values from common building materials as tested by NIST way back in 1997.

Shockingly, concrete yields the greatest signal attenuation both with and without reinforcement as compared against the other tested materials.  Apparently, NIST did not have an elevator shaft wall handy on testing day. According to this data, plywood and drywall (panel) have almost zero (well, less than 1dB) effect on signal loss. 

The following table shows dB loss values based on findings from extensive experiments performed and documented by NIST in a 1997 report called “Electromagnetic Signal Attenuation in Construction Materials”.

MaterialdB Loss at 2.437 GHz(Channel 6)dB Loss at 5 GHz (Channel 36)dB Loss at 6.515 GHz(Channel 113)
Reinforced concrete (203 mm)315563
Concrete (203 mm)294854
Brick-faced concrete184148
Brick-faced masonry block103243
Concrete (102 mm)152225
Masonry block111516
Lumber (Dry – 38 mm))344
Glass (6 mm)111
Drywall (Panel)~1~1~1
Plywood (6 mm)~1~1~1
Attenuation of various building materials from NIST IR 6055

Of course, there are other much simpler ways to measure wall attenuation values.  Read this blog for a quick and easy way to measure wall attenuation with a popular professional Wi-Fi design and survey tool.



Stone, W. (1997), Electromagnetic Signal Attenuation in Construction Materials, NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, [online], https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.6055 (Accessed November 22, 2021)

Building Materials and Propagation (Final Report) 2014 – Ofcom


Modeling of Propagation Losses in Common Residential and Commercial Building Walls


Spread the word. Share this post!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *